The Parliamentary Ombudsman of FinlandComplaints to the ombudsmanDecisionsPress releases and publicationsHuman Rights Centre The Parliamentary Ombudsman of Finland - mainpage
Kielivalinnat suomi English svenska Sámi Teckenspråk Viittomakieli Deutsch Français Eesti По-русски
Arkadiankatu 3, Helsinki
00102 Eduskunta
Tel:  (09) 4321
Fax:  (09) 432 2268
E-mail: ombudsman@parliament.fi

What are coercive measures affecting telecommunications?


Tapping and surveillance of telecommunications as well as technical eavesdropping are coercive measures affecting telecommunications.

Tapping telecommunications means secretly listening to or recording telephone conversations and comparable monitoring of other messages transmitted through telecommunications networks.

Surveillance of telecommunications refers to a right to obtain information concerning the number and duration of calls made from or to a particular connection as well as the telephone numbers from which incoming calls are made. It can also include the right to close a connection temporarily.

Technical eavesdropping means secretly listening to or recording by means of technical equipment a conversation or oral message which is not intended for the knowledge of outsiders and in which the listener does not participate.

Only in the investigation of serious crimes

Tapping or surveillance of telecommunications always requires a court order. A decision to conduct technical eavesdropping is made by the officer in charge of the criminal investigation, but he or she must submit this decision to the scrutiny of an authorised superior within 24 hours.
 
Tapping and surveillance of telecommunications as well as technical eavesdropping may be used only in the course of investigating certain serious crimes. The preconditions which must be met for tapping telecommunications are the strictest.

A court must, on the one hand, establish that the formal preconditions for tapping or surveillance of telecommunications, such as the gravity of the crime under investigation, are met and, on the other, consider the necessity of coercive measures in the criminal investigation.

The law requires that the information obtainable through surveillance can be assumed to be of very great significance in solving the crime. When a court decides to grant an order, it must determine such matters as the period of validity of the order and specify the telecommunications connections and persons to which the measure will apply.




Share
[31/10/11 11:02 ]
Printable version Mainpage Back to previos page Top of this page Feedback


Press releases

3.10.2011
A authority must present itself under it's own name 
Ombudsman?s decision on Trafi and Carea complaints
 
21.9.2011
Ombudsman recommends recompense for delay in judicial review of mental health case 

Explication of legislation on compensation for delays in judicial proceedings also recommended

 
20.9.2011
Hospital compensating patient for isolation in conditions that violated human dignity 
 
25.8.2011
Recruitement ban imposed by city of Tampere was contrary to equal treatment and non-discrimination 
Deputy-Ombudsman issues reprimand to Tampere City Board
 
15.7.2011
Guide dog users were not consulted when their dog was temporarily taken away 
Reprimands from Ombudsman
 
All press releases

Share